The Constitutional Choice of Bicameralism
نویسندگان
چکیده
Studies of political economy in recent years have placed emphasis on the operating characteristics of political and economic institutions. The premise of this work is that constitutional features of the political economy provide a structure of institutional incentives inducing equilibrium behavior and practices by optimizing agents. At both the theoretical and empirical levels there are comparisons in the literature of the equilibrium tendencies of classes of political arrangements (see, for example, Persson and Tabellini 2000, 2005, respectively). Political agents behave differently (targeting benefits, producing public goods, regulating the economy, extracting rents), and the effects of their collective choices differ (size and composition of spending, level of debt, productivity and growth of the economy) in presidential and parliamentary regimes, in unicameral and bicameral legislatures, under majoritarian and proportional electoral systems, and more generally in autocratic and democratic political economies. This research has made clear that explanations of collective choice require attention to institutional building blocks in order to anticipate equilibrium performance under
منابع مشابه
Facchini Cecilia Testa Corruption and Bicameral Reforms
During the last decade unicameral proposals have been put forward in fourteen US states. In this paper we analyze the effects of the proposed constitutional reforms, in a setting where decision making is subject to ‘hard time constraints’, and lawmakers face the opposing interests of a lobby and the electorate. We show that bicameralism might lead to a decline in the lawmakers’ bargaining power...
متن کاملDEBATES: CHALLENGING EXISTING CONCEPTS Rethinking Bicameral Strength: A Three-Dimensional Approach
Bicameralism remains a common legislative arrangement, providing a classic potential check on political executives. But this potential is not always realised, leading scholars to ask which factors contribute to bicameralism that is ‘strong’. One well-established analysis is that of Arend Lijphart, in his account of majoritarian and consensus democracies. This bases bicameral strength on two dim...
متن کاملFeminism and Abortion in the United States’ Party Politics
Abstract The feminist movement in the United States like other countries has tried to establish equality for women. From the first attempts to gain constitutional right for vote, up to the current radical demands, feminists have struggled to make changes in the U.S. party politics and obtain their rights within the parties. One of the important issues in which women played a key role in party ...
متن کاملConstitutional Design for a Rent Seeking Society: The Voting Rule Choice Revisited
Buchanan and Tullock’s original trade-off model of constitutional design is used to analyze how constitutional design affects post-constitutional rent seeking, and, in turn, how the anticipation of postconstitution rent seeking should lead to modification of constitutional design—specifically with respect to imposing and maintaining effective (composite) supermajority decision rules. JEL classi...
متن کاملMoral and Social Challenges Arising from Iran\'s Political Upheavals from the Constitutional Revolution to the Fall of the Qajar Dynasty
Background: The existence of moral challenges resulting from political, social and economic crises is an inevitable issue of any society and government. Challenges are not urgent, they gradually turn into crises, and can ultimately pose a serious threat to the sovereignty. The Qajar government was in such a situation, especially after the Constitutional Revolution. Political crises and its inte...
متن کامل